Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Here We Go Again Yall! [super Mario 3d World

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Nintendo Announces Super Mario 3D All-Stars - Forth With Some other Merch

  • Thread starter Sundae
  • Start appointment
  • Our mail server is beingness DDoS attacked, and so you volition have to look to receive a confirmation email.
Vault Boy
  • #41
That'southward what I'1000 maxim. Why not port over the remake which has much more content-wise when compared to the original (more levels, more playable characters, minigames, etc.)?
If annihilation, this sort of makes me desire to give the remake a spin, although that games seems expensive as hell.
Duncan Hills Coffee
  • #42
I look at the drove a bit more positively than nigh others here, but I still feel mixed about it.

Firstly, every bit someone who isn't into emulation, I recall it'southward dandy that Nintendo is really re-releasing Sunshine and Galaxy. A lot of Mario 3D stuff exterior 64 doesn't see a lot of re-releases, and beyond that I am curious as to how they adapt Sunshine and Galaxy to hardware that isn't 1:1 with their original releases (Sunshine's heavy use of the GameCube'southward analog shoulder buttons and Galaxy's movement controls and IR pointer). Plus I like that they're releasing all three in a bundle instead of individually, and I like the idea of playing them on a Switch (honestly I especially like that nosotros've gotten to where a game as k and royal as Galaxy tin be played portably).

That said, I do feel they got lazy with the actual re-releases. Recall, the original All-Stars wasn't just ports of the NES games, they were remakes from the footing up with enhanced xvi-bit graphics and quality of life improvements such as save files and not needing to crush Lost Levels 8 times to get to the final part of the game. Meanwhile, 64 and Sunshine haven't seen whatsoever sort of graphical improvement. I don't intendance about graphics, but at the aforementioned time if you're going to call it 3D All-Stars I kinda feel it should follow in the same vein as the original. People have mentioned the DS remake of 64, which should have been the path Nintendo took if anything. At that place'due south besides the fact that Galaxy ii is missing, and while I prefer 1 over two, its absence is still major because it is even so a big 3D Mario game and i of the all-time Mario games period.

Not to mention the whole limited run shit. I don't understand why they would make it in limited supply and then end information technology in March. Function of me hopes its considering they're trying to exercise something major that month (i.due east. Galaxy two), just it'southward still shitty to brand a limited run at all considering it just ways the production is going to get stupid expensive for anyone unlucky enough to not have gotten it the first time around. This is the 35th anniversary, don't punish people who couldn't make information technology.

I'm still probably going to get information technology only because on paper the production is something I want and take been wanting for a while, merely at the same time I don't similar the business surrounding it and I especially feel that more could accept been washed with it.

Takayuki Yagami
  • #43
Release the WiiU Zelda ports you fucking cowards.
Uncle Joey
  • #44
>express printing
>even the digital version will be taken down afterward March
Fucking why?
Raiken

Raiken

Making Nanomachines slap-up once more
  • #45
With a new expansion at that.

And online co-op
Release the WiiU Zelda ports y'all fucking cowards.

Zelda's 35th is around the corner.

I'1000 glad that sunshine finaly gets a release, but the prospect of it getting released like this removes one of the flagship games for a potential libary of both the N64 and GC with the subscription.(not that they are putting effort in it anyway, how long did it take to go fucking donky kong and we had zero in like iv months.)

Scarlett Johansson
  • #46
Why is all this shit merely available digitally and for a limited time?
Sundae
  • #47
Non to mention the whole limited run shit. I don't understand why they would brand information technology in limited supply and so end information technology in March. Part of me hopes its because they're trying to do something major that month (i.e. Galaxy 2), simply it's still shitty to make a express run at all considering it only ways the product is going to get stupid expensive for anyone unlucky enough to non take gotten it the first time around. This is the 35th anniversary, don't punish people who couldn't make information technology.
>limited printing
>even the digital version will be taken downward after March
Fucking why?

Nearly likely because Nintendo plans on selling them individually on the eshop after March, and will charge more to purchase them dissever than equally a bundle.

That's likewise probably why Galaxy 2 is being left out of this bundle, and then they can sell it separately downwards the road to squeeze more coin out of customers.

Vault Boy
  • #48
Release the WiiU Zelda ports you fucking cowards.
They probably will next twelvemonth, it'll be that series' 35th anniversary by then.

They might even have Breath of the Wild ii set by and so and some other cool shit.

Chin of Campbell
  • #49
Information technology'southward non okay when Nintendo does information technology >: (
Marissa Moira
  • #50
I look at the collection a scrap more positively than most others hither, but I withal feel mixed near it.

Firstly, as someone who isn't into emulation, I think it's cracking that Nintendo is actually re-releasing Sunshine and Galaxy. A lot of Mario 3D stuff outside 64 doesn't see a lot of re-releases, and beyond that I am curious equally to how they adapt Sunshine and Milky way to hardware that isn't 1:one with their original releases (Sunshine'south heavy use of the GameCube's analog shoulder buttons and Galaxy's motion controls and IR pointer). Plus I like that they're releasing all iii in a package instead of individually, and I like the idea of playing them on a Switch (honestly I especially like that nosotros've gotten to where a game equally thousand and majestic as Milky way can be played portably).

That said, I do experience they got lazy with the actual re-releases. Call back, the original All-Stars wasn't just ports of the NES games, they were remakes from the ground upwardly with enhanced 16-flake graphics and quality of life improvements such as save files and non needing to beat out Lost Levels eight times to get to the final part of the game. Meanwhile, 64 and Sunshine haven't seen whatever sort of graphical comeback. I don't care about graphics, just at the aforementioned time if yous're going to call information technology 3D All-Stars I kinda feel it should follow in the aforementioned vein as the original. People have mentioned the DS remake of 64, which should have been the path Nintendo took if annihilation. There's too the fact that Galaxy ii is missing, and while I prefer 1 over 2, its absence is even so major because it is still a large 3D Mario game and one of the all-time Mario games period.

Not to mention the whole express run shit. I don't understand why they would make information technology in express supply and then cease it in March. Office of me hopes its because they're trying to do something major that month (i.e. Galaxy 2), but it's withal shitty to make a limited run at all because it just ways the product is going to go stupid expensive for anyone unlucky plenty to non have gotten information technology the get-go time around. This is the 35th anniversary, don't punish people who couldn't make it.

I'm still probably going to become it but because on paper the product is something I desire and take been wanting for a while, but at the aforementioned time I don't like the business surrounding it and I specially experience that more could have been washed with it.

To be entirely off-white, the 25 anniversary drove was just the SNES rom of Allstars shoved on a Wii disc.

The 35th has more than effort put into it than that, I hateful it only took them 10 years to give a small amount of effort. Perhaps by the 45th anniversary they can have the games with 4k Textures and able to run a stable 30 frames per second.

Supposedly Mario 64's camera and motility piece of work like a normal game at present and is less clunky.

  • #51
I love Nintendo, only I dearly wish they'd end doing bogus scarcity bullshit. I mean, I'g non a businessman, just if you lot can sell more than units at the same cost you get more dosh, correct?
Raiken

Raiken

Making Nanomachines bang-up over again
  • #52
To exist entirely fair, the 25 anniversary collection was just the SNES rom of Allstars shoved on a Wii disc.
HOW DARE Yous

It too came with a disc with x songs and 10 random sound clips.

Oh and a wii manual sized retrospective

And a cardbord box

Edit:

I love Nintendo, only I dearly wish they'd stop doing bogus scarcity bullshit. I hateful, I'm non a businessman, but if you tin sell more than units at the same toll you get more dosh, correct?

The only affair that would make sense if they desire to make certain that their stock gets sold out, but as it is mario and some of his most pop outing this makes fifty-fifty less sense .

Nintendo did this with zelda once that they gave away a retrofitted version of zelda four swords on the 3DS/DSi and removed it after some time, but at least that i was gratis.

Vault Boy
  • #53
Supposedly Mario 64's camera and movement work like a normal game at present and is less clunky.
We can promise that Nintendo would put that amount of attempt into the game, that would make information technology a better experience.
Pissmaster
  • #54
HOW Dare You lot

It also came with a disc with ten songs and 10 random sound clips.

Oh and a wii manual sized retrospective

And a cardbord box

Edit:

The only thing that would make sense if they desire to make sure that their stock gets sold out, but as it is mario and some of his most popular outing this makes even less sense .

Nintendo did this with zelda once that they gave away a retrofitted version of zelda four swords on the 3DS/DSi and removed it afterward some fourth dimension, but at least that one was free.

That music CD made me laugh, I institute it at a thrift shop past itself one 24-hour interval and forgot what it came with, and I put it in my motorcar'south CD actor on the fashion abode to cheque it out. The last 10 tracks really are just direct up single sound furnishings. Like one rails is the "ba-ding!" money audio. Nothing else. That'south one-half the tracks on the CD.

Also the ISO for Super Mario All Stars Wii is similar 4mb when compressed

Kosher Dill
  • #55
If this means you can play Galaxy without those moronic motion controls, I'll exist all over this similar white on rice.
ProblematicUser420
  • #56
Why is all this shit simply bachelor digitally and for a express time?

The 3D All Stars game is going to take a limited impress run apparently.

As for why the digital shit is for a limited time? The theory I heard that makes nearly sense is that they probably expected to have BOTW2 or something else finished for this holiday, and with corona fucking shit up this is all they are left with so they need to create a scare tactic to push button sales for the fiscal twelvemonth.

Pee Wee Herman
  • #57
I'd guess no considering the amount of praise that game's been getting recently.

That'southward what I'k saying. Why not port over the remake which has much more content-wise when compared to the original (more levels, more playable characters, minigames, etc.)?


Information technology was a launch game for the original DS in 2004 and the graphics are jagged as fuck. It would take more piece of work to make that look better on the Switch compared to 64 where they basically don't take to practice anything aside from upscaling.
ds.png

Price is now confirmed to be $60. Not worth the price for 3 upscaled ports without any new additions gameplay wise or graphically. If Galaxy 2, 3D World and Land were included that would be a adept bargain.

overpriced.png

eBay sellers are already cashing in on the limited press and fools are buying.

mario.png
Archeops

Archeops

Trying to notice the meaning of Life, no luck so far
  • #58
Aw Christ, hither we go again...

What I was going to say has already been said by a lot of other users, but one thing I practise have say is that I await the Super Mario Bros. Game & Watch to be more of a collector's item than the physical repackage, especially when y'all have 3D All-Stars being available on the eShop and the Game & Watch being its own console into account.

Marissa Moira
  • #59
It was a launch game for the original DS in 2004 and the graphics are jagged as fuck. It would take more work to make that await improve on the Switch compared to 64 where they basically don't have to do anything aside from upscaling.

Cost is at present confirmed to be $threescore. Not worth the cost for 3 upscaled ports without any new additions gameplay wise or graphically. If Galaxy 2, 3D World and Land were included that would be a good deal.

View attachment 1569353

eBay sellers are already cashing in on the limited printing and fools are buying.

View attachment 1569374

It's readily available on best Buy
LazarusOwenhart
  • #60
The Mario Kart AR toy is gonna exist complete hell for anyone who has pets.
Yep I want it specifically because the blue shell pales into insignificance when compared with a furiously excited Jack Russell. The 3d All Stars collection though, yeah they tin accept my money.

Similar threads

  • Forums
  • Off-Topic
  • Games

frederickwhisis.blogspot.com

Source: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nintendo-announces-super-mario-3d-all-stars.75851/page-3